| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Canada (Director of Investigation and Research) v Southam Inc ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Canada (Director of Investigation and Research) v Southam Inc
''Canada (Director of Investigation and Research) v Southam Inc'', () 1 S.C.R. 748 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on judicial review. In this case the Court first set out the standard of review of "reasonableness ''simpliciter''", which directs the court to only review decisions that are "not supported by any reasons that can stand up to a somewhat probing examination".〔para. 56〕
==Background==
Southam Inc. purchased a number of small newspapers in the Vancouver region. The Competition Bureau investigated the purchase as a violation of the ''Competition Act''. The Competition Tribunal held that Southam violated section 92 of the ''Competition Act'' and ordered the company to sell off one of the papers. The Tribunal found that the newspapers were not in the same market with regards to print advertising markets. There was a decrease of competition in real estate advertising and not the retail advertising market.
Southam appealed under section 13 of the ''Act'' to the Federal Court of Appeal. The Federal Court of Appeal held that it owed no deference to the Tribunal's finding that the markets were not the same and so it substituted its own findings that the markets were the same. The Court refused to set aside the remedy that had been ordered.
The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the Tribunal warranted any deference by the reviewing court.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Canada (Director of Investigation and Research) v Southam Inc」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|